We the People are the De Jure Authority: Article 1 of the 1820 Maine Constitution S1-4 of 24.

by | Aug 11, 2023 | Activism, Commentary, Conservative, Education, Exposes, Inspirational, Journalism, Keep Maine Free, Maine, Opinion

Section 1 Natural rights: “All men are born equally free and independent, and have certain natural, inherent and unalienable Rights, among which are those of enjoying and defending life and liberty, acquiring, possessing and protecting property, and of pursuing and obtaining safety and happiness.” The phrase “all men” means the race of mankind. We are all born with equal opportunity in the manner of having equal freedom of our will to make decisions in our own lives. This equality does not mean equality of expected outcome or absolute equality in nature. Our rights are unalienable, meaning they cannot be permanently taken away by any alleged authority, although we may consent to give license for others to infringe on these rights, such as through our non-rebuttal and acceptance. We, as people, have a right to enjoy and defend life and rights, or the rights and lives of others, including by the bearing of arms, See A1 Sect. 16. People do not need a permit or license to exercise inherent rights. However, if you are acting as an accommodating party to a U.S Federal Citizen entity, you are not a party to these protections and do not have the rights of one of the people. You must also be aware that any license or ID or other such document issued by the de facto does not belong to you, you merely act as a holder. Any property or possession you may claim that has been registered does not belong to you, in their eyes, you gave the de facto a claim on it by registering it with their company. You must revoke, rescind or void the claim by exercising your right to remedy due to their fraudulent paperwork, lack of disclosure and breach of trust.

Section 2. All power is inherent in the people. “All power is inherent in the people; all free governments are founded in their authority and instituted for their benefit; they have therefore an unalienable and indefeasible right to institute government, and to alter, reform, or totally change the same, when their safety and happiness require it.” We the people are the de jure authority in this realm, our power is inherent, meaning an essential constituent or characteristic, an attribute that is intrinsic, it is part of the nature of mankind. People may choose to create a government by their authority, and men and women may choose to be governed by a government, for their benefit. We are the creator, not the slave, and reserve the right to unmake a government as much as we may make a government, as our safety and our pursuit of happiness require it. Government authority and its ability to exercise power could be likened to a fire, a destructive master when allowed to act outside of our control, and a useful yet potentially dangerous servant. In my lifetime, I have not witnessed anyone with a greater disdain and contempt for their public service and the general populace than government workers. Town clerks, Postal employees, Police Officers, what I have seen more often than not, we are treated as an inconvenience, as an obstacle and an irritation at best, and as an enemy of the State or a belligerent slave at worst. ‘Just comply with my tyranny and my will over you, why do you have to be difficult?’ I think it is time to flip the dynamic back to where it should be.

Section 3. Freedom of worship. “All men have a natural and unalienable right to worship Almighty God according to the dictates of their own consciences, and no one shall be hurt, molested or restrained in his person, liberty or estate, for worshipping God in the manner and season most agreeable to the dictates of his own conscience, nor for his religious professions or sentiments, provided he does not disturb the public peace, nor obstruct others in their religious worship…” The writers of the Constitutions knew the meaning of the word person. A person is a persona, a mask. A living persona could be a man or woman who at times acts as a baker, a hairstylist, or a Baptist, those are persons, personas. The government is not supposed to interfere with worship or with religion unless it violates natural law, disturbing or breaching the peace in public, or obstruction of others liberties.

;-and all persons demeaning themselves peaceably, as good members of the State,…” A Citizen is a persona, a person, therefore a citizen of a state can be referred to by the term person. You are not a citizen, you are a man or a woman who may at times act, to put on the mask of a citizen. …shall be equally under the protection of the laws, and no subordination nor preference of any one sect or denomination to another shall ever be established by law,…” The government chosen by people is not authorized to meddle with religion or worship in the manner of administrative management, and the government is certainly not allowed to pick winners and losers.

“…nor shall any religious test be required as a qualification of any office or trust, under this State; and all religious societies in this State, whether incorporate or unincorporate, shall at all times have the exclusive right of electing their public teachers, and contracting with them for their support and maintenance.” This further illustrates the freedom and liberty enjoyed by worshippers from government control, (barring violations of the laws pertaining to their status and jurisdiction) including with those who may choose to serve in an office. This section also makes it clear that the writers knew the fact that not everything is structured as a corporation, as “the government” and many religious organizations are today.

Section 4. Freedom of speech and publication. “Every citizen may freely speak, write and publish his sentiments on any subject, being responsible for the abuse of this liberty;” Note the lowercase citizen, not the uppercase citizen, as “Citizen” means a specific class of citizen, such as a Federal Citizen or a State Citizen. When lowercase c is used on citizen in this document, it is an umbrella term that is speaking of the general populace, people’s persons in general. Regardless however, this document is for the government and its actors, not for people. So those people who consent/contract to be Citizens of the true government of Maine are still protected by this document. However, this section makes a note of the fact that citizens are responsible for their speech and any abuse they perform with this right. Self governance, self responsibility for the consequences of their speech within their community. It is not within the purview of the government contracted by this Constitution to regulate or inflict retribution for written and audible speech, as the actors of a government will inevitably use such an authority as a bludgeon against criticism. One’s speech can directly impact their image in the community at large and with their family and friends. True, we are ultimately not responsible for the emotions and reactions of others, but we must acknowledge that what we write and say can and will have an effect on others for better or worse.

“…no laws shall be passed regulating or restraining the freedom of the press; and in prosecutions for any publication respecting the official conduct of men in public capacity, or the qualifications of those who are candidates for the suffrages of the people, or, where the matter published is proper for public information, the truth thereof may be given in evidence, and all indictments for libels the Jury, after having received the direction of the Court, shall have the right to determine, at their discretion, the law and the fact.” The “State” or the STATES do not hold the authority to restrict the people’s free press. In auditing videos I often see Cops asking for “press credentials” or a “press pass” when an auditor claims to be acting as press. Tell me, if “the State” was given the enumerated power to control the press, the news media, what abuses would (have) ensue(ed)? Retaliation against whistleblowers perhaps? Freedom of the press applies to any one or more of the people who choose to act as the press. The failure in logical thinking can be attributed to the LEO’s indoctrinated need for control and to project authority in all situations, an ignorance and/or disregard of Constitutional law contract, and belief that “the State” or municipality and its policies, mandates, ordinances, bylaws or the revised statutes apply to everyone and are always valid. Any State or STATE statute, policy, mandate, ordinance, bylaw, code or rule that attempts to deprive one or more of the people of their inherent rights is void where people are concerned.

Where the confusion is rooted is that those who act as 14th amendment (U.S. Federal Constitution) U.S./Federal Citizen persons. U.S. Federal persons are enfranchised parties and debt slaves, and are not party to Constitutional protections from government action, or to the American Common Law, and are subject to all Federal Legislation and enfranchised U.S. STATE OF STATE corporate “laws.” However, most of the American people have been tricked into operating as an accommodating party to the U.S. Citizen entity for a hundred years, and are treated as such: Surety for the debts of the U.S. Inc, cargo, a resource, employees, slaves, property of the U.S. Gov, existing in a colorable law jurisdiction based on deception and fraudulent contracts.

Freedom of speech is important, even if you do not like or agree with it. Your will and desire to shut down speech can be turned right around and used on you if allowed to exist at all. The fact that a government exists at the will of the people with privileges and not rights is also vital to our security. As an example, a citizen writes a scathing article about a corrupt car dealership that is dumping lemon-cars onto customers. The car dealer, the brother in law of a local district judge, and the Sheriff’s uncle, conspires with the BAR administered judiciary and the enforcers in the executive to falsify charges against the whistle blowing citizen, therefore allowing the facilitation of the arrest of the whistle blower. While the citizen whistleblower is dealing with false and frivolous charges by corrupt executives, acting as the attack dogs of attorneys, the Car Dealer sues the citizen with the intent of putting him into the ground financially and to crush him under legal fees and through the whistleblower being overwhelmed. What is the remedy and recourse when it is the government actors that are the criminal conspirators? How can one go through the court system for remedy when the judiciary is the problem? Does one have the financial resources or willpower to fight the sharks in their playground for years and years? The bad actors of the de facto are counting on you not being able to get in the ring with them more often than not. This is why people need to pull their heads out of their butts regarding “the system” and its procedures. What is the remedy when the system and its procedure is the problem?! The American common law jury or grand jury process, operating through an assembly of the people, being men and women living in community. The people on Maine have a right to suspend the law whenever their security, peace and happiness necessitate it, see Article 1 subsection 2, 13, 15. This is what we tried to educate the corporate Sheriff for Androscoggin County about, the man commonly called Eric G. Samson. But Eric has thus far proven to be a good company man and corporate minion, speaking out of one side of his mouth about serving people, while enforcing criminal conspiracy with his hands, the deputies.

-T. Jas. J AKA: The Mad Mainer

Help Support The Effort

0 Comments

Join the discussion...

Support

Maine Electric Rates: Legislative Failures and Consumer Burden

Maine Electric Rates: Legislative Failures and Consumer Burden

About a year ago The Maine Anchor published an interview with Jim LaBrecque who gave a history of why Maine has such high electric rates. The question is, did the 131st, Democratically controlled legislature do anything for the people of Maine, or did they represent special interest groups with their hand in your pocket?

Beyond Red and Blue: Navigating Political Turmoil in Modern America

Beyond Red and Blue: Navigating Political Turmoil in Modern America

Are we still the United States? Would a redesigned American flag with alternating red and blue colored stripes separated by neutral white ones be a better representation of our country’s present political turmoil? Should ideologically crafted polarization of opinion...

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This

Discover more from The Maine Anchor

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading