Does the Democrat party merit broad public confidence? After failing timely acknowledgement of physical and mental deterioration of its Presidential standard-bearer and obvious lack of preparedness for prompt and credible succession, how can it best restore public confidence prior to the next election? In the current absence of a visibly able and willing successor, what can be done to assure voters of its ability to articulate and advance an appealing legislative agenda? The image of a voice for the forgotten and oppressed is losing its allure as the new federal administration pursues big-picture, game-changing domestic and international relationships that should be of broad citizen benefit. It must simultaneously overcome disruptive immigration and law-enforcement handicaps introduced by its predecessor and establish groundwork for economic recovery while moderating divisive political posturing. A clear majority has spoken, and continued all-issue resistance does not contribute to national well-being or international competitive standing. Given existential circumstances, both parties would be well served by first resolving the half-dozen major, big-picture issues affecting all Americans. Continued minority focus on niche special interests while obstructing more meaningful progress does not portend a recovery of popular brand recognition. That’s especially critical in the wake of serious revelations of past administrative shortcomings and outright corruption. The way to regain leadership respect is to acknowledge historical mistakes and substitute constructive assistance for adamant resistance. Phil Osifer