
Presidential Candidacy: Unveiling Risks of Minimal Vetting Before the 2024 Election
Are the hidden advantages to delayed and hasty presidential candidacy from cursory personal background investigation finally coming to light within a month of the national election?Can it be a total surprise that minimal vetting of millions of illegal immigrants has extended to the head-of-ticket candidate to lead our nation?Does late background exposure of the sitting Vice President and her husband inspire confidence in the future well-being of 335-million Americans?How many citizens may come to regret voting early in 2024?
As the public strives to understand the meaning and implications of equity and inclusion, the concept of legal and economic fairness remains problematic.Should a President be personally liable for a ‘wrong’ decision made in office, presumably in good faith and under the oversight of Congress and the judiciary?Is it ‘fair’ for the wealthiest 1% of earners to contribute 45% of all personal income taxes, the bottom 75% to pay 11%, and 40-million people owe nothing or receive federal subsidy?
We’re at a serious inflection point in national and world history.It’s no time for a novice “LINO” (leader in name only) demonstrably lacking in pertinent leadership attributes – knowledge, analysis, communication, inspiration, compassion and respect.Executive control by unelected, unidentified and unseen “backroom” parties is anathema to governance of our democratic republic.We deserve to know the true voice of leadership.
Phil Osifer



0 Comments