Should we feel sorry for presidential candidate Harris because she has been callously used by her party to win the White House in 2020 and, because of subsequent deceit and misjudgment, now is propelled into a potential leadership role for which she is unqualified and unprepared? The intended responsibility is so important that unidentified hostile forces attempted to take the life of her opponent.Does her sponsoring party regard the duties of the presidency as seriously as that would-be assassin? The logical foundational platform for a presidential candidate with a prosecutorial background is restoration of equitable law and order.Unfortunately, her record of remarkable leniency at the state level has led to increased criminality, starting at the lowest level of youthful thievery.Less than two months remain to convert that limited and problematic record of achievement into plausible credibility for one of the world’s most prominent leadership positions.Cosmetic transformation is neither sufficient nor achievable. After an extended period of public avoidance, that audience is becoming more critical in two respects:(1) demanding candidate details as to how various trial-ballooned objectives are to be accomplished and (2) becoming increasingly problematic to the candidate’s dwindling chances of success. Phil Osifer